<Order DETECT or Books> <Home Page> <Info. Page> <Contact us: Info@levelsofanalysis.com>

Tutorial for Multiple-Level Analysis

(After viewing the pdf files, use the back button on your browser to return to this page.)
(To select another tutorial click here)

 

Overview

Multiple-level analysis is described in six pdf files in different ways.
Click on the file below that you prefer and scroll through the material to get a feeling for multiple-level analysis.
 

 

Data Set A


DETECT Program

DETECT for Windows® uses windows to tell DETECT what analyses to perform. All the windows available in DETECT are described in the manual. The manual uses single-level analysis and data set A as an example but how to perform multiple-level analysis is also described. The actual program generated by DETECT for windows for this analysis is listed at the beginning of the output listed below.


Output


Interpretation


A selection of published studies with real data using multiple-level analysis

Illustration of emergent effects:
Dansereau, F., Yammarino, F., Markham S., Alutto J., Newman J., Dumas M., Nachman S., Naughton, T, Kim, K, Al-Kelabi, A., Lee S., and Keller, T.(1995). Individualized leadership: A new multiple level approach. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 413-450.

Illustration of Cross-level effects:
Dansereau, F., Alutto, J., and Yammarino, F. (1984) Theory Testing in Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall

Illustration of level-specific effects:
Yammarino, F. and Dubinsky (1992). Superior-subordinate relationships: A multiple-levels-of-analysis approach. Human Relations, 45, 575-600.

For a discussion of the above published studies see:
Dansereau, F. and Yammarino, F. (2000). Within and between analysis: The varient paradigm as an underlying approach to theory building. In K. Klein and S. Kozlowski (Eds.) Multilevel Theory, Research and Methods in Organizations (425-466). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

A note about DETECT

DETECT's practical significance indicators ( such as Cohen's eta squared) are compatible with the report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on Statistical Significance (1999) that effect sizes should "always" be reported along with p values, and that "reporting and interpreting effect sizes in the context of previously reported effects is essential to good research" (p. 599)

<Order DETECT or Books> <Home Page> <Info. Page> <Contact us: Info@levelsofanalysis.com>